also sprach Margarita Manterola <margamanter...@gmail.com> [2014-12-09 20:17 +0100]: > Instead, I'd rather have only one (the decision meeting), and have > all the other conversation be done over the mailing list in > advance.
Regardless of whether we have a decision meeting or not — this should really be up to the committee to define — I think it would be beneficial if we reserved a time slot *now*, and I suggest that it'd be 29 January, maybe 1930 UTC. We can easily cancel this meeting if it's not needed and we have time to find an alternative if one of the main stakeholders is already booked then. I fear that using dudle closer to the time is going to expose more conflicts and inevitably make the job of whoever makes the decision harder when they see who they are going to exclude with whatever date/time they choose. Unless there are objections, I'd like someone from the coordination team to please make this suggestion official. Meanwhile, we should be discussing the bids! Judging from the volume of questions asked on the list so far (my lack of questions included), both of them must be perfect! ;) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
