also sprach Patty Langasek <harmo...@dodds.net> [2014-09-21 19:29 +0200]: > In which case, you consider DebCamp "free time", which brings us full circle > back to a debate I know you don't want to go anywhere near. Trust me. Please > call it "hacking time", despite what you prefer to call it.
I disagree. DebCamp is DebCamp, and we should restrict it to people trying to get work done. DebConf14 had free slots you guys called hacking time. I know plenty people who did not hack then, and it was not expected, was it? > The experiment of combining hack time with conference time was > intended to address this issue. We were fortunate enough to be > able to incorporate a few extra days (capping weekends) due to the > timing in the US to help balance it a little so we could fine-tune > going forward. I'd be very disappointed to see the experiment go > to waste. Noone is suggesting that. If you read our proposal, you will see that it adopts the idea. I just don't think we should call it hacking time when people are free to do whatever they want… including hacking! -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
