On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:20:46AM +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Have you considered having rather a sliding DebConf year which is, like, > a 4 months period with DebConf at its center? Would that be too short in > your opinion?
My original proposal was two months after DebConf ended. I think it would make sense to begin once sponsorship starts coming in. > > I thought the DPL and the Debian auditor should get access to the > > DebConf accounting as well. > > AOL, that would ease budget monitoring quite a lot. I have never considered this in doubt. I have more to say, but I will finish fully accounting up both DebConf9 and DebConf10 first. - richard -- | Richard Darst - rkd@ - boltzmann: up 610 days, 3 | http://rkd.zgib.net - pgp 0xBD356740 | "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free" _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
