Hi, On Sonntag, 27. März 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > To wrap up on this, I'm fine with having debconf's own earmarks / > accounts, as long as there are the periodic merge windows we have > discussed elsewhere. [...]
Yay. Glad we finally all agree on how handle this! :)
> I'm under the impression that we have a general agreement on the
> separate earmark scheme, provided that it's alive only for a specific
> time window. We "just" need to find a way to define the time window ...
How about:
Time windows starts with the first transaction and by default ends 2 months
after DebConf.
If the default should be changed, this needs agreement between Debian auditor
and DebConf accounting team/person (and should be discussed in mails send to
debconf-t...@l.dc.o and cc: to the Debian auditor).
?
Alternativly: s/2 months/3 months/
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
