On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:55:25AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 01:56:48PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote: > > I'd say that Open Day selection people should also be able to mark > > things as "official", then. > > Since several DebConfs I wonder whether we should change this > > official / unofficial > > branding into > > spnsored / not sponsored > > to express what we *really* mean. It always confuses people what > the distinction between official and unofficial means.
+2 Though I agree with the other commenters about finding the right words to use. (reminds me of the Twisted (I think that was it) documentation I read that said "code with an open thesaurus). The main/only benefits to being "Official" are pre-planned, advertised to attendees slightly more, and videoed, right ? If there are other similar renamings to do for DC10, we'll make that happen, too. For one, I wanted to "Independent->Sponsored" at least. - Richard -- | Richard Darst - rkd@ - lefschetz: up 145 days, 11:58 | http://rkd.zgib.net - pgp 0xBD356740 | "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free" _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
