also sprach Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> [2014-09-04 12:00 -0700]: > For that matter, perhaps the conference organizers could send > a single mail to the set of people who checked that box during > registration, requesting input on this topic?
We could, but for what purpose? Let's just assume that 50% write back saying that they object to being photographed. In the context of Aigars honest and thoughtful mail, this would put us in a very difficult situation without an easy way out. So instead, in response to Aigars mail, I am leaning more towards changing our policy and making it clear to attendees up front that they are in public space. The only thing I would like to see changed is that the photo data don't go to Google or Flickr or whoever else, but stay on our own infrastructure with a clear message that they must not appear on Facebook or other such thievery services. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
