Luke Faraone <[email protected]> writes: > On 4 September 2014 13:38, martin f krafft <[email protected]> wrote: >> also sprach Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> [2014-09-04 12:33 -0700]: >>> On a side note: I am note aware of any legal or privacy problems >>> occuring from uploading public CC/GPL-licensed photos to either >>> Google Plus or Flickr (paid version in both cases) >> >> Do their terms of service not include any form of implicit copyright >> transferral, e.g. what Facebook does? IANAL, but if you upload >> a picture to Facebook, you are giving it to them for whatever their >> use may be. If that use is in violation of the licence on the data, >> then I'd say *you* as the uploader are the one breaching the >> licence. > > http://blog.flickr.net/en/2011/05/13/at-flickr-your-photos-are-always-yours/ > > The terms do not seem to have materially changed in the interim. > > This appears to be similar to the license given to Facebook at > <https://www.facebook.com/terms.php>: >
Those licenses seem incompatible with CC-BY-SA and such (when it comes to photos by not yourself), since they require giving the site a license which permits some proprietary redistribution. -john _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
