Hi, > The issue with darktable is that nobody can make the image as clear, as with RT or DPP. With all of it's power and all of competitors' 2-slider weakness.
I believe it's quite good: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BSQA2Q49RwLVcs9TzB8v79ROW-vR-V4n/view?usp=sharing (also a few seconds, because I've preset for this. 2 profiled denoise instances - one for color, one for luma + defringe to reduce green halos). > The issue is that a mom takes a bunch of shots from school performance (indoor) and can do nothing with it by means of DT. Agree, I don't believe it's target for DT. Cheers, Dominik pon., 5 lis 2018 o 13:36 użytkownik Andrey <parihaar...@gmail.com> napisał: > пн, 5 нояб. 2018 г. в 14:17, Sturm Flut <sturmf...@lieberbiber.de>: > >> Hi, >> >> ignoring that this is one of the cases where not setting the camera to >> "Auto" would have resulted in a much better picture and avoided most of >> the issue to begin with: >> > Av-priority. Just a technical image to explore nr tools. > > >> >> Profiled Denoise in Wavelet mode with strength 0.2 already looks pretty >> identical to what DPP does, at least to me. XMP is attached. >> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Zx47DOzDyRRZdKNZ8QNnHf5yPS3IYy6v > identical? > > >> >> The output from RawTherapee looks oversharpened. > > That was 2-second tune which is very good - full of details and do not > have color noise. > Here is 4-seconds tune: > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_s1WzY2D_fgxTs0sjP4ygsPUcnf_GfkA > > >> Maybe that's your >> issues with Dartktable as well? If there's noise in the picture it is >> usually better to fine-tune using the Equalizer instead, and/or use >> masks to sharpen areas selectively. >> > The issue with darktable is that nobody can make the image as clear, as > with RT or DPP. > With all of it's power and all of competitors' 2-slider weakness. > The issue is that a mom takes a bunch of shots from school performance > (indoor) and can do nothing with it by means of DT. > But she has zero problems with DPP. And she needs just a small demo to do > the job in RT. > I get your idea. Just waned to clarify. Thanks again. > > Cheers, > Andrey > > > >> kind regards, >> Simon >> >> Am 03.11.18 um 17:58 schrieb Andrey L: >> > Hello, guys. Canon DPP makes me crazy, but DT is unable to compete with >> > neither Canon DPP, nor RawTherapee :( >> > Could you please pay some attention to DarkTable's noise removal >> > opportunities? >> > I have to spend senconds with Canon DPP to suppress noise on high-iso >> > image, >> > I need minutes to get a good result in RawThrerapee, but nobody can >> > spend hours >> > to make bad result with tons of noise reduction tools. Please, break the >> > last barrier to DT :`| >> > Here my example: >> > original image: >> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz9fwFLCJOjNMnJlTzgwcHZOdTA >> > canon dpp: >> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz9fwFLCJOjNc1RoWW9kN3d3V0k >> > rawtherapee: >> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz9fwFLCJOjNNnZWNjVSYXhaX28 >> > >> > The best efforts In general lead to green noise on barbells. It's too >> > complex problem for regular photographer. >> > >> > >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to >> > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org >> > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > -- Best Regards, Dominik Markiewicz ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org