> > so basically any way that invertize zero works is a combination of
> > properties of consistency and such of things you can do with numbers
> >
> > long ago maybe before i was born somebody made a small ai that derived
> > rules of math
> >
> > i feel more able to consider that a smidge without being scared as
> > much! but it would basically turn into an executable knowledge graph
> > which is scary agai--
>
> looking at knowledge graphs being scary (imagining a node and an edge
> of a graph quaking in fear [MISTAKE])--

i don't really know why they'd be scary. but thinking and remember
that i've worked on implementing them a lot, the scariness seems
related to leveraging their use. the executableness seems relevent.

but the idea of a language that can store its own instructions doesn't
seem that scary ..

of course this is a funny space ... me making use of it, and sometihng
about it referencing itself

maybe what's scary is designing structures that form inferences about themselves

Reply via email to