> > so basically any way that invertize zero works is a combination of > > properties of consistency and such of things you can do with numbers > > > > long ago maybe before i was born somebody made a small ai that derived > > rules of math > > > > i feel more able to consider that a smidge without being scared as > > much! but it would basically turn into an executable knowledge graph > > which is scary agai-- > > looking at knowledge graphs being scary (imagining a node and an edge > of a graph quaking in fear [MISTAKE])--
i don't really know why they'd be scary. but thinking and remember that i've worked on implementing them a lot, the scariness seems related to leveraging their use. the executableness seems relevent. but the idea of a language that can store its own instructions doesn't seem that scary .. of course this is a funny space ... me making use of it, and sometihng about it referencing itself maybe what's scary is designing structures that form inferences about themselves