Charles Wilson wrote: > So, IIUC, alternatives-1.3.30c-10 isn't *itself* actually broken, right?
No, I didn't mean the package is broken, just that the alternatives themselves, i.e. the symlinks, were wrong. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/