Charles Wilson wrote:

> So, IIUC, alternatives-1.3.30c-10 isn't *itself* actually broken, right?

  No, I didn't mean the package is broken, just that the alternatives
themselves, i.e. the symlinks, were wrong.

    cheers,
      DaveK



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to