On Apr 6 13:33, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Wouldn't it help if libc.a, libm.a etc. wouldn't export any symbols at > >all? I mean, eventually there's libcygwin.a linked in which satisfies > >all of the requested symbols. What would break if the secondary libs > >pointing to cygwin1.dll would be stubs? > > We rehashed all of this years ago. IIRC, some configuration scripts > actually look for symbols explicitly in the libraries.
Hmm, too bad. So it was a naive thought. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
