On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >Wouldn't it help if libc.a, libm.a etc. wouldn't export any symbols at >all? I mean, eventually there's libcygwin.a linked in which satisfies >all of the requested symbols. What would break if the secondary libs >pointing to cygwin1.dll would be stubs?
We rehashed all of this years ago. IIRC, some configuration scripts actually look for symbols explicitly in the libraries. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
