Please discuss on both. I believe the agreed rules are clear, this issue is whether or not we follow them.
The following comment is made as an excuse for committing the RHEL/CentOS patches: If at any time there is a strong opinion that a pull-request should NOT be merged it is appropriate to down-vote it via a -1. - John T. From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Hirschfeld, Rob Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:09 AM To: rha...@suse.de; crowbar Subject: Re: [Crowbar] RHEL/CentOS pull requests merged without any +1 from our side Yes, continue to discuss on the list or IRC! IMHO, the calls provide a place/time to close issues. It allows everyone to know when we’ll make a decision so they can get their points in before. -----Original Message----- From: crowbar-bounces On Behalf Of Ralf Haferkamp Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 8:54 AM To: crowbar Subject: Re: [Crowbar] RHEL/CentOS pull requests merged without any +1 from our side Hi, On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 08:40:17AM -0500, rob_hirschf...@dell.com<mailto:rob_hirschf...@dell.com> wrote: > Vincent, > > This would be a good topic for discussion at the next planning. I may sound like a broken record. But why should this wait until the next planning call? IMO it makes perfect sense to continue the discussion here on the mailing list. Deferring discussions like this to the calls doesn't really help in building a community around crowbar. Just my €0.02, Ralf _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com<mailto:Crowbar@dell.com> https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
_______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
