Thanks, re LAP, was familiar with the term in fee. According to Wikipedia there were early land purchase schemes involving loans but none as attractive as those under the Wyndham Act.
Peter > On 30 Jun 2020, at 12:43 pm, elwyn soutter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Peter, > > LAP stands for “Land Act Purchase”. As far as I am aware, it was introduced > with the 1903 Land Act, often known as Wyndham’s Land Act, so you shouldn’t > see it in use before that year. It provided the final piece of legislation > to make land ownership more reasonable in Ireland, especially for farmers. It > provided Government backed mortgages to finance the purchase of the land and > freehold, and there was also some sort of mechanism for bridging the gap > where a land owner and farmer couldn’t agree the price. > > In the Valuation Revision books these purchases are marked with the letters > “L.A.P.” in purple ink, plus the relevant year is normally written in the > right hand column. The landlord’s name is deleted and the words “In fee” > inserted. In fee means you own the freehold. > > Quoting from the Encyclopedia Britannica: > > “At the close of the century, the Conservatives initiated a policy designed > to “kill Home Rule by kindness” by introducing constructive reforms in > Ireland. Their most important achievement was the Land Purchase Act > <https://www.britannica.com/topic/Wyndham-Land-Purchase-Act> of 1903, which > initiated the greatest social revolution in Ireland since the 17th century. > By providing generous inducements to landlords to sell their estates, the act > effected by government mediation the transfer of landownership to the > occupying tenants”. > > Source: > https://www.britannica.com/place/Ireland/The-rise-of-Fenianism#ref316060 > <https://www.britannica.com/place/Ireland/The-rise-of-Fenianism#ref316060> > > > As I understand it, the widespread inability to buy their land was something > that galled many Irish farmers. (Landowners wanted the income rather than the > capital so they mostly didn’t want to sell, though you do see the odd sale in > the records). But for many farmers you got say a 30 year lease and spent half > your life improving the farm, only for the land owner to then put the rent up > because the place was now worth more, thanks mostly to your efforts. And if > you didn’t accept the increase, you could be required to leave. No wonder > many farmers went off to live in a country where land was available for > outright purchase (often with grants). As the 1800s progressed various > piecemeal legislative changes were made, making it slightly harder for > landowners to hike up rents unreasonably. I don’t know the precise details > but latterly, in general, if a farmer had a longer lease and had been paying > his rent and abiding by the terms of the lease he had an almost guaranteed > right to renew, and there were statutory limitations on increasing the rent. > So it was a sort of security of tenure. Not nearly as good as freehold, but > certainly much more secure than the arrangements in the 1600s and 1700s when > it was fairly easy to evict tenants at the end of their lease, and/or hike > the rent up. > > > > Elwyn > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 01:22, Peter McKittrick <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Thank you, Elwyn. > > Your explanation of “reps of” and background was very helpful. Obviously long > term leases could be dealt with as any other asset, but what threw me was > that I would have expected some more legal language (e.g. executor of……legal > representative of…etc). > > So the lease I have been looking at would have been in name of and signed by > Robert McKittrick and purely on an ex post basis, when the solicitors for the > lessor drew up the sale prospectus for sale in 1872, they found that the > lessee was deceased (1869) so they listed the Tenant as Representatives of > Robert McKittrick. In fact son John was Occupier in 1860 (Griffith) when > Robert was still alive, so John would have probably occupied under a private > arrangement with his father and ran the farm (probably mainly flax growing) > paid the rates. Interestingly, looking more closely at the terms of the > subject lease, there was a clause against assigning, mortgaging, under > leasing or otherwise disposing of the interest, except by will, but that > obviously did not prevent occupation by a son. But yes, you would expect that > “Reps of” could only operate under a will. > > Another interesting feature of the lease arrangement was the existence of a > reversionary lease over part of the land involving a large (probably > prohibitive) rent increase for that part of the land at the expiration of the > main lease. The maps are only viewable on Find My Past in black and white and > the land subject to the reversionary lease is bordered in yellow so it's not > possible to easily identify the part involved and its significance. > > Later, from the Revision Books available at nidirect, John’s son Joseph > inherited the lease or was at least occupier. As Elwyn states, things got > better for Lessees as by a 1901 Revision Joseph held the land in fee (entry > stamped L.A.P.-exact expansion of acronym yet to be found). I assume LAP > indicates that Joseph took advantage of one or other of the attractive > government purchase assistance schemes, probably one under which the money > was lent over a long term, going by the date. Later schemes seemed to involve > an outright grant. Joseph eventually sold the land to a Peter Donnelly. > > Happy to see any further discussion! > > Peter McKittrick > > >> On 29 Jun 2020, at 11:06 pm, elwyn soutter <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Peter, >> >> Sorry if you feel I misinterpreted your words. (You said: “may be to avoid >> having to draw up a new lease until it was necessary.”) Dodge wasn’t >> intended in any pejorative way, simply as being expedient. >> >> >> Elwyn >> >> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:47, Peter McKittrick via CoTyroneList >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> Just in case my email didn’t go to the mailing list, I’ll repeat my response >> to Elwyn Souter: Elwyn, at no stage did I suggest it was a “dodge” thank >> you. >> >> Peter >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On 29 Jun 2020, at 8:16 pm, Peter McKittrick <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > Elwyn, at no time did I suggest it was a “dodge” thank you. >> > >> > Peter >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > >> >>> On 29 Jun 2020, at 7:24 pm, elwyn soutter <[email protected] >> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> >> Regarding “reps of” cases, it was common for there to be significant >> >> delays in winding up of some estates. That could be a combination of slow >> >> or ineffective executors or it could be because there were disputes or >> >> other legal matters which delayed things. >> >> >> >> As a random search, I went to the PRONI wills website and looked for >> >> people who died between 1858 and 1862 but whose estates were not granted >> >> probate until between 1890 and 1900. There are 36 such cases. So it took >> >> up to 32 years for probate to be granted in a fairly significant number >> >> of cases. And until that was done the executors had control over lease >> >> renewal etc. So any property transactions relating to those estates would >> >> have “reps of” for many many years. (It wasn’t a dodge to avoid a new >> >> lease, as Peter suggests. It was just that the owner was dead but the >> >> property had not yet been passed on formally to the person who had >> >> inherited it. So the person with temporary jurisdiction, and landlord, >> >> was the executor(s). >> >> >> >> Here’s a William Bradley who died in 1877. Probate was finally granted in >> >> 1940. Just a slight delay of 63 years. (The estate was valued at a >> >> whopping £25). >> >> >> >> Bradley William of Drumard county Tyrone farmer died 26 January 1877 >> >> Administration W/A Londonderry 13 September to Enoch Bradley farmer. >> >> Effects £25. Probate: 13 September 1940. >> >> >> >> On many of the lengthy delay cases you will find the letters “d.b.n” in >> >> the probate abstract. DBN is short for “De bonis non” a term used by the >> >> Probate Court when dealing with estates where the original executor(s) >> >> did not fulfil their obligations to the deceased, perhaps because they >> >> were overseas or even dead themselves, and no-one else took any action to >> >> resolve things. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Elwyn >> >> >> >>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 07:25, Peter McKittrick via CoTyroneList >> >>> <[email protected] >> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rick, you asked for an example of "Representatives of [Name] being >> >>> listed in relation to tenancies. The example I’ve seen is when the >> >>> Altmore Estate was auctioned in 1872 and the sale prospectus listed all >> >>> the existing lease agreements including one over an Altmore property >> >>> i.n.o. Robert McKittrick where the Tenants Names are recorded as >> >>> "Representatives of Robert McKittrick". This document is available on >> >>> subscription through Find My Past Landed Estates Court Rentals1850-1885. >> >>> By 1860 and Griffith, Robert’s son John (don’t think he was the eldest) >> >>> is in Occupation of the property and by 1869 Robert had died, but in >> >>> 1872 the lease agreement with Reps of Robert McKittrick was still being >> >>> relied upon. >> >>> >> >>> Regards >> >>> >> >>> Peter McKittrick >> >>> >> >>> > On 28 Jun 2020, at 8:33 am, Peter McKittrick <[email protected] >> >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > Rick, good topic. The only thing I’ve noticed is that the lessee is >> >>> > sometimes described as “Representatives of.....“ May be to avoid >> >>> > having to draw up a new lease until it was absolutely necessary say >> >>> > when the lessor changed. >> >>> > >> >>> > Peter >> >>> > >> >>> > Sent from my iPhone >> >>> > >> >>> >> On 28 Jun 2020, at 6:20 am, Rick Smoll via CoTyroneList >> >>> >> <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Hello all …I've been having difficulty finding information >> >>> >> concerning how tenancy was passed along from generation to generation >> >>> >> on the plantation farms. What was the legal framework for inheriting >> >>> >> the lease on the farm that the family had been occupying … in our >> >>> >> case for at least 150 years prior to the land acts at the end of the >> >>> >> 19th century? Hoping somebody might be able to steer me somewhere on >> >>> >> this issue. >> >>> >> Also, any insight on how a decision was made within a family >> >>> >> regarding which son (or daughter) would assume responsibility for the >> >>> >> lease? >> >>> >> Thanks, as always … >> >>> >> Rick Smoll >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -----Original Message----- >> >>> >> From: elwyn soutter <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >>> >> To: James McKane <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >>> >> Cc: Rick Smoll <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; >> >>> >> CoTyroneIreland.com <http://cotyroneireland.com/> Mailing List >> >>> >> <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >>> >> Sent: Thu, Jun 11, 2020 8:21 pm >> >>> >> Subject: Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Morrison Family Name in Ulster >> >>> >> 1610 - 1633 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Rick, Ballyboe is from the Irish words “Baile bo”meaning “cow land.” >> >>> >> According to Philip Robinson - “The Plantation of Ulster”,a ballyboe >> >>> >> was “A small Irish land division which, before the >> >>> >> plantation,represented the territory within which several families >> >>> >> worked the land.Although the real area of the ballyboe varied greatly >> >>> >> with the quality of theland, it was assumed by the plantation >> >>> >> surveyors to contain 60 acres ofprofitable land in most areas of >> >>> >> north-west Ulster. Many modern townlands haveevolved from these >> >>> >> ballyboes.” Not all land in Ireland was requisitionedby the Crown at >> >>> >> the time of the Plantation. At least a third remained in thehands of >> >>> >> local Irish landlords, normally provided they agreed to be loyal >> >>> >> tothe Crown. An obvious example would bethe Maguires who had lands >> >>> >> in Fermanagh. Chunks of land were declared forfeitfollowing the 1641 >> >>> >> uprising and reallocated. Details in the Down survey: >> >>> >> http://downsurvey.tcd.ie/down-survey-maps.php >> >>> >> <http://downsurvey.tcd.ie/down-survey-maps.php> Robinson spends some >> >>> >> time discussing theorigins of settler names in Tyrone, and to what >> >>> >> extent Scottish undertakers hadScots tenants, and English undertakers >> >>> >> had English tenants. The implicationbeing that they originated in >> >>> >> their landlords respective estates. However therewas evidently a lot >> >>> >> of mixing. For example on p122 he says: The evidence of Scots >> >>> >> settling outsidetheir allocated baronies of Strabane and Mountjoy is >> >>> >> supplemented by a statementof Lord Audley’s in 1614 when he claimed >> >>> >> that his estate of Finagh and Rarone inOmagh barony had as many Scots >> >>> >> as English in it. Although there is considerable degree ofcontinuity >> >>> >> between 1630 and 1666 in the distributional pattern of >> >>> >> Britishsettlement, and indeed in the persistence of English and >> >>> >> Scottish localities,the actual surnames on most estates did change >> >>> >> dramatically. This turnover ofpersonnel cannot be attributed simply >> >>> >> to the ravages of the 1641 rebellion, forcomparable changes can be >> >>> >> observed between 1622 and 1630. A high degree oftenant mobility is a >> >>> >> striking characteristic of plantation settlement, despitethe >> >>> >> continuity of settlement patterns.” He goes on to discuss colonial >> >>> >> spread. “In1622 the percentage of Scots on any Tyrone estate was >> >>> >> closely related towhether or not the estate was Scottish owned, and >> >>> >> only marginally related tothe physical distance from Londonderry as >> >>> >> the natural entry point for Scottishsettlers. However by 1630 the gap >> >>> >> between the statistical significance of thesetwo factors had >> >>> >> narrowed, and by 1666 it was the distance from Londonderrywhich was >> >>> >> most significant. This supports the model of colonization >> >>> >> outlinedabove, whereby the process of direct plantation, with >> >>> >> subsequent internalmigration operated simultaneously with that of >> >>> >> colonial spread. Furthermore thecontention that colonial spread >> >>> >> became relatively more important than directplantation with time is >> >>> >> also supported.” (This continues for pages but you willhopefully get >> >>> >> the general drift. Manysettlers in Tyrone and particularly the Scots >> >>> >> arrived via Londonderry and movedacross Tyrone. Some stayed put and >> >>> >> some moved about. After 40 years colonialspread meant that a >> >>> >> significant percentage were no longer in the place wherethey first >> >>> >> settled). Loughterush is in the barony of Omagh East.For me, the >> >>> >> absence of Morrisons in that part of Tyrone in the Muster Rolls (iec >> >>> >> 1630) strongly suggests your ancestors must have there arrived >> >>> >> afterthat. There’s only 1 Morison in Tyronein the Muster Rolls, a >> >>> >> Robert Morsion in Strabane barony. Perhaps your familywere connected >> >>> >> to him and moved south to Loughterush. So colonial spread? Your >> >>> >> question is whether Audley brought theMorisons over? I doubt he >> >>> >> brought them over himself because he appears to haveacquired those >> >>> >> lands from his uncle, Lord Castlehaven who was the >> >>> >> originalUndertaker. The family were from Petersfield in Hampshire. >> >>> >> Morison is not a name particularly common inthat part of England so >> >>> >> that would make me doubt they were Castlehaven tenantsin England. But >> >>> >> I might be wrong. Elwyn >> >>> >> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 01:21, James McKane <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> A search of the CoTyroneIreland.com <http://cotyroneireland.com/> >> >>> >> Tithe Applotment Index shows this entry >> >>> >> >> >>> >> | MORRISON | Edward | Loughterush | Sloy Manor, Kilskerry 1826 >> >>> >> | >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Jim McKane >> >>> >> Kitchener, Ontario >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 5:02 PM Rick Smoll via CoTyroneList >> >>> >> <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I located a copy of the 1654-1656 Civil Survey that covers the >> >>> >> townland of Loughterush in Kilskeery Parish … this obviously does not >> >>> >> list the tenants names, only the owner … but there is interesting >> >>> >> information there that for me begs some questions that perhaps some >> >>> >> of you could help me with. I have attached the top page with the >> >>> >> header that describes the area and names the owner, and then the page >> >>> >> that lists Laghterish (older spelling or misspelling of Loughterush) >> >>> >> among the townlands in his possession. >> >>> >> Questions:1. Is there any reason to have confidence that Col. Audley >> >>> >> Mervin would have been the one to have brought the Morrisons over to >> >>> >> Loughterush? 2. Were all of the lands of Ulster apportioned out in >> >>> >> the time frame around 1610, or did it take a longer period of time >> >>> >> (ie, could Mervin have been granted his land after 1630?) He was also >> >>> >> listed among those who came to the aid of Londonderry during the >> >>> >> siege by James II in 1690, so he was not likely an original grantee >> >>> >> in 1610.3.The total acreage for the townlands of Lisnahanna, >> >>> >> Loughterush, and Derryvokenan (?) is listed as 65 acres … there is >> >>> >> obviously a lot more than 65 acres there (even Irish acres) ; the >> >>> >> Morrison farm alone was about 40-50 acres … could that be referring >> >>> >> to only the amount of acreage under cultivation? >> >>> >> Other items of interest: … I now know what a Balliboe is. >> >>> >> … Based on the note in the left column of the first page, Audley was >> >>> >> apparently among those protestant royalists who were penalized by >> >>> >> Cromwell with the settlement act of 1652. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Rick Smoll >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -----Original Message----- >> >>> >> From: elwyn soutter <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >>> >> To: CoTyroneIreland.com <http://cotyroneireland.com/> Mailing List >> >>> >> <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >>> >> Cc: rsmoll999 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >>> >> Sent: Thu, May 21, 2020 9:27 pm >> >>> >> Subject: Re: [CoTyroneMailingList] Morrison Family Name in Ulster >> >>> >> 1610 - 1633 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Rick, The surname, the general location and thefamily denomination >> >>> >> all point to them being settlers who probably arrived inIreland in >> >>> >> the 1600s. MacLysaght’s surnames of Ireland describesMorrison as “an >> >>> >> English name numerous inUlster.” The location ie Tyrone, is a county >> >>> >> heavily settled by Scots &English in that period, and the family >> >>> >> denomination (Methodist in 1901) alsopoints to them being incomers. >> >>> >> (They would almost certainly have been Church ofIreland – ie >> >>> >> Anglican- in earlier times, prior to Methodism’s arrival inIreland). >> >>> >> So in effect you have 3pointers to them being of settler origins. The >> >>> >> Muster Rolls c 1630 show a number ofMorrisons in Ireland, and one in >> >>> >> Tyrone, but none in the Barony of Omagh East(which includes >> >>> >> Loughterush) so that points to a post 1630 arrival in theLoughterush >> >>> >> area, if not in Ireland. It’s very rare to find any documentationfor >> >>> >> the 1600s, unless you were an Undertaker or major land owner, or had >> >>> >> landforfeit after the 1641 rebellion. Theearliest likely records >> >>> >> might be in the Registry of Deeds which start around1709. If the >> >>> >> family registered a lease or other significant document, >> >>> >> thatsometimes gives you a date. Failing that, church records may >> >>> >> help. KilskeeryChurch of Ireland records start in 1767 so you might >> >>> >> find them there. For somepeople the tithe applotment records in the >> >>> >> late 1820s/early 1830s are often theearliest records to be found. I >> >>> >> searched the PRONI e-catalogue but see nomention there of Morrison in >> >>> >> Loughterush other than in the tithes in 1826.There were no >> >>> >> comprehensive records of when people first acquired land. Formost >> >>> >> 17th century settlers, the first 150 years or so of their timein >> >>> >> Ireland are lost in the mists of time. Elwyn >> >>> >> On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 03:06, rsmoll999 via CoTyroneList >> >>> >> <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Peter ... thanks for responding ... the links you sent are not >> >>> >> working for me. I'll do some more hunting for those sites.Sent from >> >>> >> my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S9. >> >>> >> -------- Original message --------From: Peter McKittrick via >> >>> >> CoTyroneList <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> Date: 5/21/20 8:43 PM >> >>> >> (GMT-06:00) To: "CoTyroneIreland.com <http://cotyroneireland.com/> >> >>> >> Mailing List" <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Peter McKittrick >> >>> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: >> >>> >> [CoTyroneMailingList] Morrison Family Name in Ulster 1610 - 1633 A >> >>> >> past Genealogical Society of Victoria (Australia) handout indicates >> >>> >> that Morrison appears in Scottish names in Tyrone, 1610-1633 based on >> >>> >> muster rolls and estate maps.Sources: Brian Orr, >> >>> >> Plantation of Ireland and the Ulster Scots published on >> >>> >> http://www.irishclans.com/ <http://www.irishclans.com/> >> >>> >> <http://www.irishclans.com/ <http://www.irishclans.com/>> >> >>> >> Gwen Rawlings-Barry, The Ulster Plantation (1605-1697) >> >>> >> published on http://www.canadasulsterscots.tripod.com/ >> >>> >> <http://www.canadasulsterscots.tripod.com/> >> >>> >> <http://www.canadasulsterscots.tripod.com/ >> >>> >> <http://www.canadasulsterscots.tripod.com/>> (website not >> >>> >> found).Peter McKittrick> On 22 May 2020, at 10:23 am, Gordon >> >>> >> Wilkinson via CoTyroneList <[email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:> > Rick, My guess >> >>> >> is that they could have been part of the plantation of Ulster in the >> >>> >> 17thC. I suspect(based on my surname) that my ancestors may have been >> >>> >> part of that event too but have not been able to find any records of >> >>> >> who arrived from where and when. Any help (thanks Len S. for your >> >>> >> earlier help) would be appreciated. Gordon> > On 22/05/2020 3:14 am, >> >>> >> Rick Smoll via CoTyroneList wrote:>> My Morrison ancestors occupied a >> >>> >> farm in the Loughterush townland (Kilskeery Parish) from at least the >> >>> >> mid 1700s until 1970 when the last Morrison on the farm passed away >> >>> >> (he was a bachelor), and the farm was sold at public auction. The >> >>> >> earliest ancestor I have found records for was Edward Morrison, and >> >>> >> the earliest reference to Loughterush was with the birth of a >> >>> >> daughter of his in 1781.>> My question is: Is there a way to find out >> >>> >> when the Morrisons first came to occupy the farm in Loughterush?>> >> >>> >> Thank you for any help on this.>> >> Rick Smoll>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________>> CoTyroneList >> >>> >> Mailing List>> Mailing List Email Address: >> >>> >> [email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> Change Your Preferences: >> >>> >> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com >> >>> >> >> >>> >> <http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com>>> >> >>> >> Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY <https://goo.gl/mQCKrY>> >> >>> >> > -- > _________________________________> Nereda & Gordon Wilkinson, >> >>> >> Hyde Park, South Australia.> Web: www.ozemail.com.au/~neredon >> >>> >> <http://www.ozemail.com.au/%7Eneredon> Skype id: neredon> >> >>> >> Emails: [email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >>> >> [email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >> >>> >> _______________________________________________> CoTyroneList Mailing >> >>> >> List> Mailing List Email Address: [email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> Change Your Preferences: >> >>> >> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com >> >>> >> >> >>> >> <http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com>> >> >>> >> Mailing List Archive: >> >>> >> https://goo.gl/mQCKrY_______________________________________________CoTyroneList >> >>> >> >> >>> >> <https://goo.gl/mQCKrY_______________________________________________CoTyroneList> >> >>> >> Mailing ListMailing List Email Address: >> >>> >> [email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]> Your Preferences: >> >>> >> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.comMailing >> >>> >> >> >>> >> <http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.comMailing> >> >>> >> List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY <https://goo.gl/mQCKrY> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> CoTyroneList Mailing List >> >>> >> Mailing List Email Address: [email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >>> >> Change Your Preferences: >> >>> >> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com >> >>> >> >> >>> >> <http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com> >> >>> >> Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY <https://goo.gl/mQCKrY> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> CoTyroneList Mailing List >> >>> >> Mailing List Email Address: [email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >>> >> Change Your Preferences: >> >>> >> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com >> >>> >> >> >>> >> <http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com> >> >>> >> Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY <https://goo.gl/mQCKrY> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> CoTyroneList Mailing List >> >>> >> Mailing List Email Address: [email protected] >> >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >>> >> Change Your Preferences: >> >>> >> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com >> >>> >> >> >>> >> <http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com> >> >>> >> Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY <https://goo.gl/mQCKrY> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> CoTyroneList Mailing List >> >>> Mailing List Email Address: [email protected] >> >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >>> Change Your Preferences: >> >>> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com >> >>> >> >>> <http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com> >> >>> Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY <https://goo.gl/mQCKrY> >> _______________________________________________ >> CoTyroneList Mailing List >> Mailing List Email Address: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> Change Your Preferences: >> http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com >> <http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com> >> Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY <https://goo.gl/mQCKrY> > _______________________________________________ CoTyroneList Mailing List Mailing List Email Address: [email protected] Change Your Preferences: http://cotyroneireland.com/mailman/listinfo/cotyronelist_cotyroneireland.com Mailing List Archive: https://goo.gl/mQCKrY
