On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:56:20 GMT, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Fabian Meumertzheim has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> Address comments > > test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/GetMultipleWaiters.java line 56: > >> 54: thrown[0] = t; >> 55: } >> 56: }, "waiter-A", Thread.State.WAITING); > > How about we give all the waiter-threads unique names, "timed-waiter-A" for > the timed get, and "untimed-waiter-A". That would make it easier to locate > any issues. I used slightly different names since `timed-waiter-B` would have executed an untimed `get`, which seemed confusing. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32485#discussion_r3854994020
