On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:29:15 GMT, Justin Lu <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review this PR which contains the l10n translations for between RDP1 
> and RDP2 for the JDK24 stabilization branch.
> 
> Note that these translations are only associated with changes made to the 
> stabilization branch. This PR will not include any translations for changes 
> since RDP1, that were not back-ported to the stabilization branch. Also note 
> that while most changes here are associated with an English change, there 
> were some standalone translation improvements.
> 
> Once this pull request is integrated, it will be back-ported to the jdk24 
> branch.

src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/resources/jlink_de.properties line 
80:

> 78: err.no.module.path=--module-path-Option muss mit --add-modules 
> ALL-MODULE-PATH angegeben werden
> 79: err.empty.module.path=Kein Modul im Modulpfad "{0}" mit --add-modules 
> ALL-MODULE-PATH gefunden
> 80: err.limit.modules=--limit-modules nicht mit --add-modules ALL-MODULE-PATH 
> zulässig

I see German has more being changed when compared to Japanese & Chinese. Are 
these updated translations for German specifically? I see no related change for 
the other 2 languages for say `err.runtime.link.not.linkable.runtime`.

src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jmod/resources/jmod_de.properties line 60:

> 58: main.opt.target-platform.arg=target-platform
> 59: main.opt.module-path=Modulpfad
> 60: main.opt.hash-modules=Berechnet und erfasst Hashes zur Bindung eines 
> verpackten Moduls an Module, die dem angegebenen <Regex-Muster> entsprechen 
> und direkt oder indirekt davon abhängen. Die Hashes werden in der erstellten 
> JMOD-Datei oder in einer JMOD- oder modularen JAR-Datei in dem Modulpfad 
> erfasst, der im jmod-Hashbefehl angegeben ist.

I assume this is more evidence that the German differences are just updated 
translations for German?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23184#discussion_r1920837067
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23184#discussion_r1920837417

Reply via email to