On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 19:11:12 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehw...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this extension to #22609 which now disallows `ALL-MODULE-PATH` 
>> without explicit `--module-path` option or a non-existent module path. In 
>> addition, this fixes a bug mentioned in #22609 when `ALL-MODULE-PATH` and 
>> `--limit-modules` are used in combination. It failed earlier and passes now 
>> due to alignment of `ModuleFinder`s. With this patch JEP 493 enabled builds 
>> and regular JDK builds behave the same in terms of `ALL-MODULE-PATH`.
>> 
>> When an explicit module path is being added, there is no difference. All 
>> modules on that path will be added as roots. Tests have been added for the 
>> various cases and existing tests updated to allow for them to run on JEP 493 
>> enabled builds. Thoughts?
>> 
>> Testing:
>> - [x] GHA, `test/jdk/tools/jlink` (all pass)
>> - [x] Added jlink test.
>
> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with three 
> additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Fix comment
>  - Revert "Catch case of module not in dependency tree"
>    
>    This reverts commit bfac44659e7219afe472d0e61735df119065796d.
>  - Revert "Fix comments"
>    
>    This reverts commit 92f0736a678c59035ee97563756017316aadbfe2.

This solution is simpler -- it can just detect if `ALL-MODULE-PATH` is used 
with `--limit-modules`, jlink just fails.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22494#issuecomment-2552099324

Reply via email to