On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:29:08 GMT, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Instead, I think we should look at adding a property such as jdk.patched
>>
>> You mean a new standard property - observable with
>> `System.getProperty("jdk.patched")` as well - which would also show up with
>> `java -XshowSettings:properties`? Is that the direction you are envisioning?
>
> Yes, I'm wondering if a JDK-specific (rather than standard) property could be
> more widely useful as it would allow observability tools to know that the JDK
> has been patched. It would be good to get wider input on this.
@AlanBateman The discussion doesn't see to gain much traction. Should I go
ahead and propose a bug/patch - with CSR - which adds the JDK specific
property and make it dependent on this fix? Thoughts?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22037#discussion_r1842509475
