On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:05:10 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > The long-term plan would be to not need this at all. If we were to use the > > jrt FS throughout in JRTArchive I think module patches won't matter and > > wouldn't populate to the resulting image and this could get removed. But > > that would be for another enhancement. Thoughts? > > IMO, I don't think it's worth putting the effort to support that as running > jlink on a patched runtime should be very rare corner case. Thanks for the feedback. I've filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345184 anyway as it might allow us to remove some of the special cases. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22037#issuecomment-2514752020
