On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 01:18:06 GMT, Ioi Lam <ik...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> A few clean ups:
>
> 1. Rename functions like "`s_loading_full_module_graph()` to
> `is_using_full_module_graph()`. The meaning of "loading" is not clear: it
> might be interpreted as to cover only the period where the artifact is being
> loaded, but not the period after the artifact is completely loaded. However,
> the function is meant to cover both periods, so "using" is a more precise
> term.
>
> 2. The cumbersome sounding `disable_loading_full_module_graph()` is changed
> to `stop_using_full_module_graph()`, etc.
>
> 3. The status of `is_using_optimized_module_handling()` is moved from
> metaspaceShared.hpp to cdsConfig.hpp, to be consolidated with other types of
> CDS status.
>
> 4. The status of CDS was communicated to the Java class
> `jdk.internal.misc.CDS` by ad-hoc native methods. This is now changed to a
> single method, `CDS.getCDSConfigStatus()` that returns a bit field. That way
> we don't need to add a new native method for each type of status.
>
> 5. `CDS.isDumpingClassList()` was a misnomer. It's changed to
> `CDS.isLoggingLambdaFormInvokers()`.
Looks good, thanks! Just one comment on format below.
src/hotspot/share/cds/cdsConfig.hpp line 72:
> 70: static void enable_dumping_dynamic_archive() {
> CDS_ONLY(_is_dumping_dynamic_archive = true); }
> 71: static void disable_dumping_dynamic_archive() {
> CDS_ONLY(_is_dumping_dynamic_archive = false); }
> 72: static bool is_using_archive()
> NOT_CDS_RETURN_(false);
Could you fix the alignment of the method names here?
-------------
Marked as reviewed by matsaave (Committer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18095#pullrequestreview-1920532000
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18095#discussion_r1514980583
