On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 23:49:02 GMT, Calvin Cheung <cche...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Do you mean aligning like this: 
>> 
>> 
>>   static bool is_dumping_heap()                              
>> NOT_CDS_JAVA_HEAP_RETURN_(false);
>>   static void stop_dumping_full_module_graph(const char* reason = nullptr) 
>> NOT_CDS_JAVA_HEAP_RETURN;
>>   static bool is_dumping_full_module_graph()                 { return 
>> CDS_ONLY(_is_dumping_full_module_graph) NOT_CDS(false); }
>>   static void stop_using_full_module_graph(const char* reason = nullptr) 
>> NOT_CDS_JAVA_HEAP_RETURN;
>>   static bool is_using_full_module_graph()                   
>> NOT_CDS_JAVA_HEAP_RETURN_(false);
>> 
>> 
>> I think this is more messy, and you can't easily tell that these four 
>> functions are all related to the same feature (full_module_graph).
>
> I meant the following. Just the last line #94 needs to be changed - shift one 
> space to the left after `bool`.
> 
> static bool   is_dumping_heap()                            
> NOT_CDS_JAVA_HEAP_RETURN_(false);
> static void stop_dumping_full_module_graph(const char* reason = nullptr) 
> NOT_CDS_JAVA_HEAP_RETURN;
> static bool   is_dumping_full_module_graph()               { return 
> CDS_ONLY(_is_dumping_full_module_graph) NOT_CDS(false); }
> static void   stop_using_full_module_graph(const char* reason = nullptr) 
> NOT_CDS_JAVA_HEAP_RETURN;
> static bool   is_using_full_module_graph()                 
> NOT_CDS_JAVA_HEAP_RETURN_(false);

I wanted line 94 to align the "using_full_module_graph" part with the function 
at line 93.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18095#discussion_r1513713821

Reply via email to