On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:23:16 GMT, Volker Simonis <simo...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The problem is that after >> [JDK-8281962](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292327) we call `fill()` >> unconditionally (and before calling `Inflater::inflate()`) in >> `InflaterInputStream::read()` if `Inflater::needsInput()` is true. This >> misses the case where the native inflater has consumed all its input (i.e. >> `Inflater::needsInput()` returns true) but hasn't managed to write all the >> inflated data into the output buffer (e.g. because it was to small). In rare >> cases, there might be now more input available (i.e. calling >> `InflaterInputStream::fill()` will throw an `EOFException`) but we still >> have to call `Inflater::inflate()` to consume the buffered output from the >> underlying native inflater until inflation stops. >> >> The documentation of the `inflate()` method in `zlib.h` mentions this >> explicitely: >> >>> "If `inflate()` returns `Z_OK` and with zero `avail_out`, it must be called >>> again after making room in the output buffer because there might be more >>> output pending." > > Volker Simonis has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Minor changes regarding indentation, naming and spelling > The problem is that after > [JDK-8281962](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292327) In the description, this should link to JDK-8281962 rather than (JDK-8292327). Just pointing out as someone looking at this PR in the future might get confused as to which issue caused the regression. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9881
