On Jan 22, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Petr Baudis wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 03:11:30PM -0800, Christoph Birk wrote: >> >> On Jan 21, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Petr Baudis wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 03:42:57PM -0500, Don Dailey wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Eric Baum <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If you don't do rave, or use patterns to predict likely moves, or any of >>>>> that, but just do pure monte carlo, >>>>> parallelized on a cluster,how well would that play Go? Anyone know? >>> >>> I assume you are talking about 9x9? A rather optimistic estimate would >>> be 1600 Elo on CGOS for 50k playouts per move; with GNUGo at 1800 Elo, >>> we could estimate this as 8k KGS. >> >> myCtest-50k does exactly that and it rating is 1689 +- 15 (4000 games). > > With what parameters? Is it really plain UCT? It used to be weaker...
It has always been plain UCT with k=0.5 ( uct_score = k*sqrt(log(n/p)) The only thing I changed about a year ago is avoiding super-ko. Christoph _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
