On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Eric Baum <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you don't do rave, or use patterns to predict likely moves, or any of > that, but just do pure monte carlo, > parallelized on a cluster,how well would that play Go? Anyone know? > If you are talking about a pure light playout without patterns but still using a very basic MC tree implementation, it will play very poorly compared to the best stuff we have. But it would still be better than what we had before MCTS. It might reach the 1D level assuming a good parallel cluster implementation. Don > ______________________________**_________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/computer-go<http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go> >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
