On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 03:11:30PM -0800, Christoph Birk wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 03:42:57PM -0500, Don Dailey wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Eric Baum <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> If you don't do rave, or use patterns to predict likely moves, or any of > >>> that, but just do pure monte carlo, > >>> parallelized on a cluster,how well would that play Go? Anyone know? > > > > I assume you are talking about 9x9? A rather optimistic estimate would > > be 1600 Elo on CGOS for 50k playouts per move; with GNUGo at 1800 Elo, > > we could estimate this as 8k KGS. > > myCtest-50k does exactly that and it rating is 1689 +- 15 (4000 games).
With what parameters? Is it really plain UCT? It used to be weaker... http://senseis.xmp.net/?CGOSBasicUCTBots -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The goal of Computer Science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it. _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
