In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Basti Weidemyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes

In European tournaments, I have been told, when a group is claimed by one player to be a seki, and by the other player to be dead, the player who claims it is dead will receive one stone, as a prisoner, from his stubborn opponent foreach stone he plays in his own would-be- territory.

I don't know what rule set is now applied in most European tournaments.

France and the UK now use AGA rules (or something very similar). In these countries, what you describe will indeed happen. This is done as what I consider to be a bodge, to allow the Japanese counting method to produce the result appropriate for Chinese scoring.

If Chinese rules are in use, prisoners are ignored, captured stones are just put back in the bowls, and both stones and territory are counted at the game end. This is a simpler, bodge-free, way of achieving the same effect.

Nick

If dame was filled, I see no reason why this would not be possible to implement as a cleanup phase on go-servers, like the one used for new zealand and chinese rules. Do you? It would be the human-adaption of the play-it-out-then-restore-and-count-again, that David mentioned.

Best
Basti Weidemyr

PS: It is midnight and I am really not a rules expert, like some people here. Did I overlook something?
--------------------------------

On Sep 16, 2008, at 1:06 AM, Peter Drake wrote:

I've asked this question of a couple of people and got different answers, so I thought I'd check here.

Suppose, under Japanese rules, I throw a (hopeless) stone into your territory. I keep passing until you've actually removed it (playing four stones inside your own territory, thus losing a net three points). If you try to pass as well, I stubbornly insist that the stone is alive, thus restarting the game.

What prevents this sort of abuse? Is this one of those cases where the tournament director has to adjudicate?

(This is not a problem under Chinese or AGA rules.)

Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/



_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

--
Nick Wedd    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to