Improved view and more games. After 1336 games black still wins. This
is sorted by frequency of occurrence, so we know that e5 c4 c5 (or
equivalent) is the most popular move for cgos.
I think I should nega-max the percentages instead of showing it just
from white's point of view. So the first line would show E5 then gives
the score from BLACKS point of view if he plays E5.
E5 46.6% 1336
| C4 49.9% 657
| | C5 55.9% 152
| | D4 40.2% 112
| | D3 50.5% 109
| | C6 43.5% 85
| | E3 49.2% 61
| | D6 61.5% 26
| | C7 45.8% 24
| | D7 42.9% 14
| | E7 54.5% 11
| | F3 66.7% 9
| | C3 75.0% 8
| | E4 57.1% 7
| | F7 80.0% 5
| | G5 60.0% 5
| | G7 50.0% 4
| | G4 50.0% 4
| | G3 50.0% 4
| | D5 33.3% 3
| | F4 33.3% 3
| | D2 0.0% 3
| | D8 100.0% 2
| | E2 50.0% 2
| | B5 100.0% 1
| | B6 100.0% 1
| | G6 0.0% 1
| | F2 100.0% 1
| C5 41.4% 345
| | C4 39.7% 141
| | D4 46.6% 73
| | E3 35.6% 59
| | D3 37.5% 24
| | D5 42.1% 19
| | C3 81.8% 11
| | F3 0.0% 6
| | E4 25.0% 4
| | G3 33.3% 3
| | G4 50.0% 2
| | G5 100.0% 2
| | E2 100.0% 1
| C3 51.3% 152
| | C5 50.4% 121
| | C6 40.0% 10
| | C4 85.7% 7
| | E7 40.0% 5
| | D7 40.0% 5
| | F7 50.0% 2
| | C7 100.0% 2
| D4 38.6% 132
| | D5 38.3% 120
| | C5 30.0% 10
| | D6 100.0% 1
| | C4 100.0% 1
| B5 38.2% 34
| | C4 36.4% 11
| | D4 66.7% 9
| | C3 0.0% 6
| | D3 33.3% 3
| | E3 33.3% 3
| | E2 0.0% 1
| | F3 100.0% 1
| B4 61.5% 13
| | D4 66.7% 3
| | D2 66.7% 3
| | C5 100.0% 2
| | D8 0.0% 1
| | F4 100.0% 1
| | G4 0.0% 1
| | D3 100.0% 1
| | C4 0.0% 1
| D5 66.7% 3
| | D4 66.7% 3
Jason House wrote:
> That's 41% of the 206 games that begin with E5 {G5,C5,E7,E3}
>
> On Feb 12, 2008 1:38 PM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> This pattern doesn't appear to often:
>
> 5 E5 G5 G4
> 6 E5 C5 C4
> 8 E5 C5 C6
> 12 E5 E7 D7
> 12 E5 E7 F7
> 13 E5 G5 G6
> 14 E5 E3 D3
> 15 E5 E3 F3
>
> (assuming I transposed these correctly)
>
> - Don
>
>
>
> Olivier Teytaud wrote:
> >> 46 E5 C5
> >
> > By the way, mogoRelease with moderate computation times often plays
> > E5-C5-C6, and this third move C6 is very weak (at least I've
> > been told so :-) ).
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > computer-go mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
