We want a version simply for the study - it may not make a performance difference and will probably hurt the performance for a given time level, so I would suggest it not to be the primary version.
- Don Sylvain Gelly wrote: > No problem for me. I did not want to multiply the number of versions > not to confuse people. With the double version, don't forget it will > increase the memory footprint for a given number of nodes. > > Sylvain > > 2008/1/30, Olivier Teytaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > I can provide a new release with double instead of float. > (unless the other mogo-people reading this mailing-list do not > agree for > this; Sylvain, no problem for you ?). > > > I don't know exactly when it begins to do bad moves. However, I > know that > > after several hours, the estimated winning rate converges to 1 > or 0, with > > crazy principal variations, and the cause is low resolution of > single > > floats. In this study, it should no be a big factor of > unscalability given > > the number of simulations. > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org <mailto:computer-go@computer-go.org> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
