On Dec 12, 2007 7:28 PM, terry mcintyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I've googled so far looks a bit rudimentary - mostly based on unix fork > semantics. I'm looking for something much lighter-weight, Erlang-style, > which could support thousands of cheap concurrent threads. In Erlang, the > cost of such threads is comparable to the cost of a function call.
Why not go for Erlang, then? :-) There's people talking about starting using a lispy syntax for erlang (of course that won't make it lisp) regards, Vlad _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
