> http://greencheeks.homelinux.org:8015/~drd/public/study.jpg > ... > I'm actually testing 2 programs - both of them UCT style go > programs, but one of those programs does uniformly random > play-outs and the other much stronger one is similar to > Mogo, as documented in one of their papers.
Hi Don, Can you describe the implementation of heavy and lite in more detail; especially lite? I've been trying the libego program "out of the box", and am up to 200,000 UCT playouts, but still gnugo 3.6 on level 6 is winning 10 out of 10. According to your chart, lite with 128K playouts should be about 50 ELO points higher than gnugo 3.7 (on level 10 I assume?). (256K playouts should be 130 points higher.) I'm wondering if there is a standard set of UCT enhancements that everyone is doing? TIA, Darren _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
