Maybe a large, better quality jpg can be added to the website info. . .


> On Jun 10, 2020, at 7:38 16PM, david--- via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I am not sure this picture will be small enough for the list. When I bought 
> my 35-2, I found a memo from C&C in the nav  table saying the maximum back 
> stay tension is 2050 pounds
> 
> <image0.jpeg>
> 
> David Kelly
> Baraka C&C 35-2
> Noroton, CT
> 
>> On Jun 10, 2020, at 6:13 PM, Don Kern via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Bailey
>> 
>> I have one of those earlier C&C 35 Mk2 ('74 #255) and have not tried to 
>> attach the bulkheads to the overhead.  She does work in heavy air.  Two 
>> years ago the original outboard holding tank failed, which I had to remove 
>> by dismantling the head's bulkheads and cabinetry.  I replaced all screws 
>> with slightly larger ones since more than 50% were missing or stripped.  I 
>> put a new holding tank under the v berth and replaced all the screws connect 
>> the glass to the wood cabinetry in the forward cabin - 75 % were missing or 
>> backed out.  We are not shy about pushing her hard in the last 40 years I 
>> have raced her. Last year hit 11.8 kts in a double-hander spin run.  She 
>> does creak and grown.  The most annoying thing is the head door will not 
>> stay close and bangs open when we are working her hard.  About ten years ago 
>> I did an experiment at the dock of running a line from pulpit to pulpit 
>> (weight and small block at bow for constant tension) and ran the backstay up 
>> to 3000 psi - the line rose 2" up the mast (original unbending, telephone 
>> pole mast).  The most tension I will put on backstay when sailing in very 
>> heavy air is 2200 - 2500 PSI.  Since we still compete in the top 10% of PHRF 
>> races, I have no intention of changing the original set up.
>> 
>> Don Kern
>> Fireball, C&C35 Mk2
>> Bristol RI
>> 
>> On 6/10/2020 12:07 PM, Bailey White via CnC-List wrote:
>>> Has anyone added material to tie the bulkheads to the liners for those 
>>> earlier boats?  I wasn't sure if the liner could take it or if some work 
>>> would need to be done to grind out the liner and fiberglass directly to the 
>>> hull laminate, which would be more involved and error prone.
>>> 
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Rob Ball <r...@edsonintl.com <mailto:r...@edsonintl.com>>
>>> To: Shawn Wright <shawngwri...@gmail.com <mailto:shawngwri...@gmail.com>>, 
>>> "cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>" 
>>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>>
>>> Cc: 
>>> Bcc: 
>>> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:39:15 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Rob Ball comment on 41 "robustness"
>>> Earlier C&C’s had the bulkheads ‘floating’ in the headliner groove, and as 
>>> we got into larger sizes (bigger loads) those tie downs were the solution.
>>> 
>>> On the C&C 40, there were a lot of warranty claims for those leaks, and 
>>> eventually it was decided to stiffen up things to prevent this.  The first 
>>> boat was the new C&C 35 and the bulkheads were ‘tabbed’ to the deck – much 
>>> stiffer . . . . BUT . . . . it meant that the headliner, which is installed 
>>> on the deck when it’s upside down, had to leave space for the tabbing after 
>>> the deck is placed on the hull.  And then those spaces had to be covered up 
>>> with separate pieces to blend with the headliner after the tabbing . . . . 
>>> Much more labor and cost . . .
>>> 
>>> But – a much stiffer boat – the sailmakers loved the straighter headstay  . 
>>> .
>>> 
>>> Victory by the designer over the accountants . . . .
>>> 
>>> The downside, other than cost is that when you hit a rock – the damage is 
>>> more extensive, because the boat is now actually more brittle  . . .
>>> 
>>>  
>>> Rob Ball   C&C 34
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
>>> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
>>> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray 
>>> <https://www.paypal.me/stumurray>
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
>> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
>> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> 

______________________________________________________________
Lee Youngblood & Kathleen Davis
s/v Simplicity, a 1974 C&C 35-II
Shilshole / Seattle   425-444-9109

_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to