I am surprised that all the 30’s are rated the same given the dramatic
differences in conditions they race in. San Francisco verses San Diego for
example.

Fred Hazzard
S/V Fury
C&C 44
Portland Or

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 7:08 AM Gary Nylander via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> I’m guessing most of the reviews are for boats with big changes in
> performance. PHRF Chesapeake has done some, but not often. Looking around
> the country, the 30-1, from hull number 1 (on the Chesapeake) to hull
> numbers over 600 seem to have the same 174 handicap (mine is number 593 and
> is 174 also). There may be exceptions, but I would doubt that Randy’s boat
> (assuming it has not been modified in major ways) would prompt a review.
> I’m not sure what one would do to a 30-1 to increase performance unless you
> cut a bunch of weight off the keel – and that would decrease it’s
> performance in heavy weather. At the Chesapeake rendezvous a couple months
> ago, I got to look at Rick’s number 1 and it is very similar to my 593,
> only differing is the area of chainplate attachments and some cabinet
> doors.
>
>
>
> Gary Nylander
>
>
>
> *From:* CnC-List <cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com> *On Behalf Of *David
> Knecht via CnC-List
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 12, 2019 5:40 PM
> *To:* CnC discussion list CnC <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> *Cc:* David Knecht <davidakne...@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List PHRF Reviews and Adjustments
>
>
>
> I am pretty sure that no review of ratings has been done at my club in at
> least 10 years.  Dave
>
>
>
> S/V Aries
>
> 1990 C&C 34+
>
> New London, CT
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2019, at 5:36 PM, Randy Stafford via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Well Lee, since you bring up PHRF reviews, let me ask you listers, how
> often do your clubs or RSAs conduct rating reviews and adjustments?
>
>
>
> The introduction in “the book” (
> https://www.ussailing.org/competition/offshore/phrf/phrf-handicaps/) says
> under heading "Considerations when using this listing to determine a
> handicap by averaging fleet data” that "After the initial handicap is
> chosen and the boat is raced, an empirical analysis of performance may
> permit a more refined estimate of its speed potential.”  And a review of
> https://www.ussailing.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/USPHRF-Fleets-1.pdf shows
> that most clubs derive handicaps from “the book,” then review and adjust
> based on local experience.
>
>
>
> So, how many of y’all do that?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Randy
>
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Lee Youngblood via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Sir,
>
>
>
> RE:  Randy Stafford  S/V Grenadin   C&C 30 MK I #79  LISTED as Hull #7
>
>
>
> I have put in a request for an immediate PHRF review of your boat.  With
> over 70 shipyard refinements, it’s clear now, why your boat is so fast, and
> only right that your rating reflect the changes you failed to document.  I
> expect the board will want to question you very carefully about the
> additional changes to your boat over and above the documented 1972 norms.
> I have suggested that the penalty not be limited to just changing a PHRF
> number, but the monetary fine should reflect the price of the current boat
> you have chosen to race.  Perhaps if you raced a newer more expensive boat,
> you would be disinclined to perpetrate this excessive winning streak, which
> is depressing both the local fleet and the attendance of future sailors to
> the sport.  You should hear from the PHRF board by the end of the month.
>
>
>
> Regretfully, Lee
>
> Yea, cold and wet in Seattle
>
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2019, at 2:31 09AM, Randy Stafford via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Listers-
>
>
>
> When I was buying my 30 MK I (HIN 30007972) four years ago, I came to the
> conclusion she was hull number 7 laid up in September 1972, I think based
> on this old post:
> http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/2012-April/044412.html
> .
>
>
>
> Meanwhile a discussion arose recently in the Facebook C&C Owners Group
> where a guy asked how to decode HIN 30002672.  I emailed Rob Ball hoping
> for clarification, and Rob referred me to Rob MacLachlan of South Shore
> Yachts.  Rob MacLachlan said definitively I have hull #79, not hull #7.  So
> the HIN format C&C used before standardization on November 1st 1972
> apparently didn’t include any digits indicating the month in which the hull
> was laid up.
>
>
>
> I’ll be damned, I said.  All this time I thought I had hull #7.
>
>
>
> Rick Bushie on this list owns 30 MK I hull #1, and his HIN plate says
> simply “30-1 1971N”.
>
> Brian Buttigieg in the Facebook group owns 30 MK I hull #5, he says, but
> hasn’t posted his HIN yet.
>
> Jack Rousseau in the Facebook group owned 30 MK I hull #8 and said it was
> made in 1971.
>
> Sean Dillon in the Facebook group owns 30 MK I hull #14 and says it’s a
> 1971 boat.
>
> Ed Levert on this list owned hull #19 and thought it was a 1971 boat.
>
> The owners of HINs 30002672, 30005972, and 30009472 have also been heard
> from here or in the Facebook group.
>
> Steve Guiney in the Facebook group owns hull #123 and his HIN is
> CCY301231172 (CCY was later used by the Rhode Island factory but it didn’t
> open until February 1976)
>
>
>
> It seems clear that C&C changed 30 MK I HIN formats at least twice over
> the production run.  And I shall change my email signature according to
> what I’ve learnt.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Randy Stafford
>
> S/V Grenadine
>
> C&C 30 MK I #79
>
> Ken Caryl, CO
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
>
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to