yeah - what he said!
 
makes a lot more sense than my attempt

________________________________

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Nylander
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 11:17 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List - genoa sizing


In a number of boats I've been on, the number 3 tracks allow a 'blade'
type of jib to be led inside the shrouds, and the other long tracks are
for the number 1 and 2 and the sails are led around the shrouds. As was
said, the 1's are 150 or 155 or larger (depends on the boat but most
PHRF groups limit these to 155% (don't ask why). On certain boats
(J-30's come to mind), the number 1 for one design racing is a 160 or
163 or so. On the Pearson Triton it is 170+. They get a different rating
than the PHRF boats with smaller genoas. The J-80 I race on has both
tracks and the one design rating (blade only) is different than the PHRF
(with a genoa).
 
I think some of the C&C 35's have this arrangement - a smaller track up
forward, on or near the cabin top, which is for the smallest jib.
 
The 30-1's were delivered with no tracks, one sheeted the genoa to the
toe rail with a snatch block. That made for a rather wide sheeting angle
and less pointing. Most owners have mounted tracks aft of the shrouds
and in line with them to get better pointing performance. However, these
are pretty far inboard for reaching when you would like to have the slot
more open, so some folks have a device to lead the sheet back to the
rail area. I sometimes use a snatch block on the rail and sometimes
(light air) use the spinnaker sheet twing blocks. The boat reaches
better when not choked in.
 
There is no specific percentage for a number 2, it is just smaller than
the 1, larger than the 3. Mine is about 140% - I bought it used from
Bacon's and only use it for cruising and once in a while for breezier
days.
 
Gary
30-1
 
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to