It appears the built in sprit was an option on the 99 and at least one of the 
boats on yachtworld has that installed.  Dave

On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:29 AM, Hoyt, Mike wrote:

> The pole can be used as a bowsprit if desired when using asym spinnaker.  As 
> it is 10% longer than J when the mast track is lowered fully and pole is 
> attached it acts like a short sprit.  This is how my friends sail their asym 
> spin some times.
>  
> no idea about a 99 with a sprit.  teh 101 seems to be that boat and is a 
> really interesting looking design ...
>  
> Mike
> 
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of David 
> Knecht
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 10:15 AM
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 99
> 
> Hi Mike- Thanks for the extensive review.  Everything I have read and heard 
> about the boat makes me think that one is in my future.  It  is precisely the 
> size and characteristics I was looking for, and it particularly appeals to my 
> sense of karma after my happy experience with my previous C&C (and its owner 
> group).  I will probably be looking for the shoal draft as that is a 
> compromise I am willing to make in this area since I do not intend to 
> seriously campaign the boat.  One thing you did not comment on is the 
> bowsprit.  I gather that was an option, and one that attracted me to the 
> boat.  I will be sailing mostly shorthanded and so do not intend to use a 
> full spinnaker with pole.  Having a sprit launched chute seems to be a great 
> compromise, but I have never sailed a boat with one so I have absolutely no 
> personal experience.  Can anyone comment on that?  Thanks- Dave
> 
> On Jan 28, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Hoyt, Mike wrote:
> 
>> David
>>  
>> The 99 has a few variations.  The most common and most recent being 5.5 ft 
>> draft carbon fibre mast. Initially the boat had a deeper draft keel and 
>> aluminum mast.  A very very small number had the deeper keel and carbon 
>> fibre mast and a number are the 5.5 ft keel with aluminum mast.
>>  
>> I believe the original boat was 6.4 ft aluminum mast version and then the 
>> shallow draft model was introduced as an option.  At some point groups of 
>> owners in the Chesapeake and another area convinced C&C to switch to only 
>> the 5.5 ft boat for one design purposes and to deal better with the shallow 
>> water areas where it was sailed.
>>  
>> Our friends have the 5.5 ft keel carbon mast since they bought the boat to 
>> sail in an area with a shallow entrance to our marina.  The 6.4 ft keel 
>> would not have worked there.  Their boat arrived with the waterline a bit 
>> off and C&C repainted the waterline over the first off season.  The reason 
>> for this was the design of the 5.5 ft keel which moved the center of mass 
>> aft a bit on the boat.  When racing it is very important to get the crew 
>> weight out of the cockpit and forward esp because of this.
>>  
>> A group of our friends race an Olson 30 which in our area for a time was 
>> rated the same as the 99 at PHRF 99.  They also raced in Chester Race Week 
>> against a carbon mast 6.4 ft keel version of this boat.  The Olson is faster 
>> than the Shoal Draft 99 in almost every condition until their is some chop 
>> and the winds are at approx 18 knots at which time the 99 is faster esp 
>> upwind.  The 6.4 ft keel is by our Olson friend's observation a much faster 
>> boat than the SD version.  It excels on all points of sail.  At some point 
>> in Nova Scotia it was realized that the C&C 99 handicap was based on the 
>> original 6.4 ft keel and that when C&C changed the specification for the 
>> standard boat the same handicap was used for the SD version.  This was also 
>> the case in New England.  We now have the 6.4 ft boat at 99 and the 5.5 ft 
>> version at 105 and PHRF-NE has a similar 6 second difference.  This only 
>> became apparent when a 6.4 ft model moved back to the area and we have both 
>> models sailing here.  I    believe the difference between the 5.5 ft and 6.4 
>> ft boat is more like 9 sec/mile though ...
>>  
>> The interior of the C&C 99 is well appointed.  The table is an option and 
>> hangs off the mast but is usable.  Galley seems to work out well.  The aft 
>> cabin is a bit cramped but once you wedge yourself in the bunk is quite 
>> comfortable for two people.  Have slept there many times.  The Vee berth 
>> would be considered your stateroom.  It is large, comfortable (much more so 
>> than aft cabin - trust me) and has cabinetry to store clothing etc.  Storage 
>> aboard seems adequate also and the engine seems not to have problems.
>>  
>> I also sail a lot on a C&C 115.  It has similar cabinet drawers and doors 
>> and when the boat is much used the latches seem to be flimsy.  Look for a 
>> boat where the owner was obsessive with maintenance and it will be pristine 
>> and very nice inside.  Our friend's 99 is just that - pristine.  It appears 
>> to be one year old and has great inventory of both sails and electronics 
>> that have been regularly updated.
>>  
>> For sailing be aware that the boat has an oversized J+1 pole and matching 
>> 200% spinnaker.  This is the class standard and in our area is included in 
>> the boats base rating.  This means the spinnaker is very large and can be a 
>> handful but the boat sails well with it and does not seem to be squirrelly 
>> downwind.  With the roller furling standard on the boat the common practice 
>> is to furl and unfurl the headsail while racing and the cut of the headsail 
>> is not diminished by the roller furling in size etc ...   Seems to work well
>>  
>> The wheel is a large destroyer type wheel and the boat is very responsive to 
>> the steering.  It feels quite direct and is nicely set up.  One caution is 
>> that there seems to be some problem with the shivs with the C&Cs.  The 115 
>> has had the cable jump off the shivs several times and the 99 has had this 
>> happen once.  The shivs are angled a bit but once they are replaced the 
>> problem seems to go away.  You may wish to check this area.  I believe with 
>> the 99 it occurred because a bolt worked itself out over time....
>>  
>> The 99 is a good boat and sails at a decent speed as a modern 33 foot 
>> cruising boat that can be raced.  We are all very happy with how well the 99 
>> our friends purchased has worked out.  There also has never been any 
>> indication of the hull cracking issue that was reported on some of the 
>> larger C&C models ...
>>  
>> Not sure what else to add.  These are great boats!
>>  
>> Mike
>> 
>> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of David 
>> Knecht
>> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 2:48 PM
>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>> Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 99
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 27, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Pat Nevitt wrote:
>> 
>>> I think there is someone on the list who posts occasionally that has one.  
>>> I can't remember his name.  I have a friend that owns one and really likes 
>>> his.  Do you want to race or cruise? 
>> Some of both, but the cruising is more weekending that longer and with just 
>> my wife and I.  Racing would be club for fun, not seriously campaigning.  I 
>> want a boat that can do both with me single-handing. 
>>> He mostly races his and places in the middle of a fairly competitive PHRF 
>>> fleet.  We did beat him once in my 29-2 this past frostbite series on a 
>>> 20kt wind day, but he claims it was because they turned around to pick up a 
>>> hat that went overboard  (I never saw that!).  I know of 2 for sale in the 
>>> Annapolis area.  I know the owner of one of those and he has had it for 
>>> sale for a while and is motivated to let it go.
>>> 
>>> Pat
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:47 PM, David Knecht <davidakne...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> I sold by C&C 34 a while back, and now I am in the market for a new boat.  
>>> One of the boats I plan to look at is a C&C 99.  This list was always been 
>>> of great help, when I had my previous boat, so I am wondering if anyone has 
>>> comments on that particular vintage of C&C.  I planned to search the 
>>> archive in case this has been discussed before, but I could find no way to 
>>> do that.  Am I missing it?  Thanks- Dave
>>> 
>>> Professor David Knecht    
>>> Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
>>> Microscopy Facility Director
>>> U-3125
>>> 91 N. Eagleville Rd.
>>> University of Connecticut
>>> Storrs, CT 06269
>>> 860-486-2200
>>> 860-486-4331 (fax)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>> 
>> Professor David Knecht    
>> Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
>> Microscopy Facility Director
>> U-3125
>> 91 N. Eagleville Rd.
>> University of Connecticut
>> Storrs, CT 06269
>> 860-486-2200
>> 860-486-4331 (fax)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
> 
> Professor David Knecht    
> Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
> Microscopy Facility Director
> U-3125
> 91 N. Eagleville Rd.
> University of Connecticut
> Storrs, CT 06269
> 860-486-2200
> 860-486-4331 (fax)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Professor David Knecht    
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
Microscopy Facility Director
U-3125
91 N. Eagleville Rd.
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269
860-486-2200
860-486-4331 (fax)



_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to