-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Kevin Anderson wrote:
| | I'd like to head Nucleus' position on both of these things. To be honest, | Telus' DSL (or rather PPPoE) has colored me against DSL generally, <snip> Ok I don't like/use telus but I have to interject here. Telus doesn't use PPoE, they force you to register your MAC address to get an IP through DHCP. But it isn't PPPoe. | Having said that, didn't Telus buy Nucleus? Or am I on glue. | They bought Cadvision | | Three cheers for Shaw on getting this right. They might not care as much as | I'd like for privacy, but Shaw rules aside from that. Ironically, Telus wins | that battle. I'd like to know you're basis for the Shaw privacy question, they were part of the lawsuit that sought to not require them to give out your contact info to the CRIA | | It would be interesting to have a rep from the various ISPs show up for a | bitc^H^H^H^Hdiscussion about the benefits of their various solutions. | Personally, I'd even be interested in what's coming, and such. (Wireless, | VoIP, IP6, etc) We'd certainly be a prime market. I'm sure all of us have | referred at least 10 people to a given ISP, and in many cases several | businesses too.
That's not a bad idea but I would imagine if you could convince them to come out (which I think would be a tough sell) we'd end up getting some marketing presentation. And in general the kind of questions we're likely to ask a marketing person wouldn't have the slightest idea how to answer. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBL8OIw+I3MvUBM6QRAgF8AKCtOwdWPU6SqW6pxRc7sfWoSHK1JACdGqwb QJj8Kzv8w9gvxlr+yhZvp1E= =qZ0q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
