Incoming from Adil Kodian: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:53:32 -0600, Mike Roest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Mike Roest wrote: > > > > | timmy wrote: > > | | Doesn't DSL technology rely on either PPPoE or PPPoA? I doubt the > > | cheap DLink/3com modem support an ATM interface, but I could be wrong. > > | | What encapsulation would Telus use otherwise? > > > if they are that pissed off with people using port 25 - then why dont > they open it selectively - like block 25 and 110 and 80 by default,
You're asking an ISP that has only recently figured out how to filter spam, to think intelligently about ports. I think you're attempting to stress their system with requests like this. Besides, telcos don't care about pots anymore. All the money's in cell. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling - - _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
