Doc subtasks for corresponding eng subtasks seems fine to me...
Jessica T. CloudStack Tech Pubs -----Original Message----- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 4:40 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0 Should we be creating Doc sub-task for each sub-tasks, or just a single sub-task under the main feature defect ? Because nTier Apps 2.0 comparatively covers vast areas, I created multiple sub tasks for documentation under each feature sub-tasks. Please correct me. -Radhika -----Original Message----- From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 5:55 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0 751, 752, 754 and 756 have corresponding doc bugs as sub-tasks. Probably Jira doesn't allow multi-level subtasks. -----Original Message----- From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2013 1:06 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0 Kishan, it appears that these JIRA tickets are not created as sub-tickets. It would have been good if you would have created them as sub-tasks. I tried to convert these tickets to sub-tasks and was able to convert most of them except 751, 752, 754 and 756. I suspect these didn't give me a option because they have further sub-tasks. Chip, Alex, Chiradeep, is there anyway to convert 751, 752, 754 and 756 as sub-tasks of 621? Regards, Manan Shah On 1/4/13 5:13 AM, "Kishan Kavala" <kishan.kav...@citrix.com> wrote: >nTier Apps 2.0 requirement has 20 sub-items which are not >inter-dependant. I created individual bugs for each of the sub-items >and assigned to myself the items which I plan to work on. > >Bug numbers: 746 to 768 (except 756) > >-----Original Message----- >From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] >Sent: Friday, 14 December 2012 10:19 PM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0 > >Sure, Hugo. I can add that. As you said, longer term, we should make >this work with an SDN based solution as well. > >Regards, >Manan Shah > > > > >On 12/14/12 5:32 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" <htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> >wrote: > >>Hey Manah, >> >>Can you put in a requirements that this feature is only available if >>Vlans are actually in use? It might be interesting to make sure that >>this "nTier apps" is also available for sites with an SDN based >>installation like Nicira NVP. >> >>Cheers, >> >>Hugo >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] >>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:30 AM >>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0 >>> >>> Thanks David for brining a good point regarding 2.18. You are >>>correct that a VLAN should not be exposed to an end user. I will >>>re-word the requirement to make it more specific for an admin to assign a >>>VLAN. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Manan Shah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/13/12 1:24 PM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >>> >>> >It's very hard to have a discussion here when all of the >>> >information to be discussed is elsewhere. Please consider posting >>> >it here for the discussion. >>> > >>> >WRT 2.18 - Allowing an end user to assign a VLAN ID strikes me as >>> >very undesirable. First, it allows users to have insight into the >>> >underlying infrastructure when lots of work has been exerted to >>> >abstract all of that away from end users. Secondly, it is >>> >information leakage, because you can't allow collisions, so there >>> >will be a failure to provision the VLAN which will tell folks that >>> >the VLAN is in use, which could provide information as to the size >>> >of the underlying network infrastructure or other information. >>> > >>> >--David >>> > >>> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I would like to propose a new feature for extending the nTier >>> >>Apps feature introduced in CS 4.0. I have created a JIRA ticket >>> >>and provided the requirements at the following location. Please >>> >>provide feedback on the requirements. >>> >> >>> >> JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-621 >>> >> Requirements: >>> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/nTier+Apps+ >>> >>2 >>> .0+ >>> >>Req >>> >>uirements >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> Manan Shah >> >
