On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com> wrote: > Kishan, it appears that these JIRA tickets are not created as sub-tickets. > It would have been good if you would have created them as sub-tasks. I > tried to convert these tickets to sub-tasks and was able to convert most > of them except 751, 752, 754 and 756. I suspect these didn't give me a > option because they have further sub-tasks. > > Chip, Alex, Chiradeep, is there anyway to convert 751, 752, 754 and 756 as > sub-tasks of 621?
I don't believe so. Can you close them and re-open as sub tasks please? > Regards, > Manan Shah > > > > > On 1/4/13 5:13 AM, "Kishan Kavala" <kishan.kav...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>nTier Apps 2.0 requirement has 20 sub-items which are not >>inter-dependant. I created individual bugs for each of the sub-items and >>assigned to myself the items which I plan to work on. >> >>Bug numbers: 746 to 768 (except 756) >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] >>Sent: Friday, 14 December 2012 10:19 PM >>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0 >> >>Sure, Hugo. I can add that. As you said, longer term, we should make this >>work with an SDN based solution as well. >> >>Regards, >>Manan Shah >> >> >> >> >>On 12/14/12 5:32 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" <htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Hey Manah, >>> >>>Can you put in a requirements that this feature is only available if >>>Vlans are actually in use? It might be interesting to make sure that >>>this "nTier apps" is also available for sites with an SDN based >>>installation like Nicira NVP. >>> >>>Cheers, >>> >>>Hugo >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] >>>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:30 AM >>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0 >>>> >>>> Thanks David for brining a good point regarding 2.18. You are correct >>>>that a VLAN should not be exposed to an end user. I will re-word the >>>>requirement to make it more specific for an admin to assign a VLAN. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Manan Shah >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/13/12 1:24 PM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >>>> >>>> >It's very hard to have a discussion here when all of the information >>>> >to be discussed is elsewhere. Please consider posting it here for >>>> >the discussion. >>>> > >>>> >WRT 2.18 - Allowing an end user to assign a VLAN ID strikes me as >>>> >very undesirable. First, it allows users to have insight into the >>>> >underlying infrastructure when lots of work has been exerted to >>>> >abstract all of that away from end users. Secondly, it is >>>> >information leakage, because you can't allow collisions, so there >>>> >will be a failure to provision the VLAN which will tell folks that >>>> >the VLAN is in use, which could provide information as to the size >>>> >of the underlying network infrastructure or other information. >>>> > >>>> >--David >>>> > >>>> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> Hi, >>>> >> >>>> >> I would like to propose a new feature for extending the nTier Apps >>>> >>feature introduced in CS 4.0. I have created a JIRA ticket and >>>> >>provided the requirements at the following location. Please >>>> >>provide feedback on the requirements. >>>> >> >>>> >> JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-621 >>>> >> Requirements: >>>> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/nTier+Apps+2 >>>> .0+ >>>> >>Req >>>> >>uirements >>>> >> >>>> >> Regards, >>>> >> Manan Shah >>> >> > >
