henry w <henryw...@gmail.com> writes: > you have understood my arguments pretty much. again the thing that > bothers me is that f and g are logically part of x only, but are > visible from y and z (even if and and y are declared higher up, the > same problem applies to their own related, private fns and x).
Then declare f and g inside of x using `let' or `letfn'. Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
