ok thanks for those thoughts. 

you have understood my arguments pretty much. again the thing that bothers 
me is that f and g are logically part of x only, but are visible from y and 
z (even if and and y are declared higher up, the same problem applies to 
their own related, private fns and x). 

i agree this is not clj specific and there is the same thing with private 
methods in oo. was just curious if anyone had a favoured technique to scope 
f and g so they are only visible to x.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to