On 20 November 2014 19:33, Alex Baranosky <alexander.barano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Imo, that makes the let version even better. The Clojure compiler doesn't > to allow circular dependencies, so I would consider the letfn behavior as > "surprising" and therefore unideal. > It does, via declare. This is often necessary in parsers, as often languages have some form of recursive definition (e.g. expressions can be nested in expressions). The letfn macro allows for local mutual recursion and is sometimes necessary. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
