imagine in a namespace you have functions x, y, and z which are public. function x grows a bit big, so is broken out so that it calls 2 other functions, f and g.
now, imagine with all the clean code and refactoring in the world, still f and g have nothing to do with y and z - but are declared in the same namespace and that looks untidy and lacks cohesion - even if f and g are private. should x, f and g now move into their own namespace? in that case, x doesnt live with y and z, which it should do. moving just f and g into their own ns 'guts-of-x' feels overblown. or keep x just as a var that refers to var guts-of-x/x-impl, which is a var that has the contents of the old x. or, should f and g not be top level? they could be let within x. x is then still big, but at least f and g have names and x doesnt look like a big inline jumble. please advise. thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
