that is a good point... however this lawyer's opinion seems to be holding weight in this particular situation, just hoping to find out how others have dealt with these sorts of objections
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 9:37:17 PM UTC-10, Zach Oakes wrote: > > Eclipse itself is as common as oxygen in the federal government, so I am > pretty sure their worries aren't valid. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
