On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Phillip Lord <phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk > wrote:
> Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> writes: > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Phillip Lord < > phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> Well, the law determines which part of a contract are actually binding; > >> so whether the choice of law clause actually means anything at all, > >> depends on the jurisdiction in which the law is being judged. Having > >> said this, I think your lawyers are right. The choice of law clause is > >> generally horrible. > > > > > > I guess you mean "choice of jurisdiction"? It may be horrible, but > (IANL) > > a contract without a jurisdiction seems pretty useless. > > So, GPL and most software licenses are completely useless? > Creative Commons Licenses are completely useless? > A statement such as "Copyright 2014" is completely useless? > Busted! > > > In any case, if not NY, then where? > > The UK. That's where I live, and that would make it easier for me. Any > objections? > Lemme talk to my lawyer. I'll let you know. -gregg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
