2013/11/19 Phillip Lord <phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk> > Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> writes: > > >> One of the interesting questions, I think, is the embrace the host > >> notion. One solution to the problems you describe is to just use the > >> equivalent java libraries. Is this a failure of the clojure library > >> ecosystem or a pragmatic solution? > >> > > > > YMMV : a pragmatic solution to not have to do host interop, which is less > > supported by text editors / IDEs than aliased clojure functions :-) > > Oh, I've written an reasonably large library over the top of a Java API > which adds (relatively) little but adds a nice syntax, in a evaluative > environment, and hides a few of the boring details (using Stuart > Sierra's top antipattern in clojure > http://stuartsierra.com/2013/03/29/perils-of-dynamic-scope!). > > I really don't know the answer to the question yet. >
Me neither, I can just observe that those days, I'm writing little wrappers over the libraries I learn (in the Eclipse world), starting with just "very thin wrappers just to isolate interop". And that I build upon that. A layer after the other. Too early to draw any conclusion for me. Time will tell. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
