I will second http://clojure-toolbox.com and I also recently found: http://www.clojuresphere.com/
On Monday, November 18, 2013 4:01:27 PM UTC-5, Brian Craft wrote: > > Wow, this result is shocking to me: > > In short, Clojure libraries are easy to find, their maintainers are >> receptive to feedback and patches, they are technically of high quality, >> but they’re not always very well-documented. None of that is surprising or >> particularly different from last year. >> > > This could not be more starkly different than my experience. I'm not sure > I've used a clojure library that doesn't have quirky bugs like hanging at > exit, blowing the heap by holding the heads of seqs, or just doing the > wrong thing. > > Also, I find it difficult to find libraries. When I do find libraries > they're often deprecated, or moribund. What's the easy way to find clojure > libraries? > > > On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:32:56 AM UTC-8, Chas Emerick wrote: >> >> Results of this year's survey are available here: >> >> >> http://cemerick.com/2013/11/18/results-of-the-2013-state-of-clojure-clojurescript-survey/ >> >> >> Thank you to all that participated! >> >> Best, >> >> - Chas >> > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
