Wow, this result is shocking to me: In short, Clojure libraries are easy to find, their maintainers are > receptive to feedback and patches, they are technically of high quality, > but they’re not always very well-documented. None of that is surprising or > particularly different from last year. >
This could not be more starkly different than my experience. I'm not sure I've used a clojure library that doesn't have quirky bugs like hanging at exit, blowing the heap by holding the heads of seqs, or just doing the wrong thing. Also, I find it difficult to find libraries. When I do find libraries they're often deprecated, or moribund. What's the easy way to find clojure libraries? On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:32:56 AM UTC-8, Chas Emerick wrote: > > Results of this year's survey are available here: > > > http://cemerick.com/2013/11/18/results-of-the-2013-state-of-clojure-clojurescript-survey/ > > > Thank you to all that participated! > > Best, > > - Chas > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
