2013/11/19 Brian Craft <craft.br...@gmail.com> > What I don't expect is clojure users to report that the libraries are just > great. Clojure libraries are very weak compared to other modern languages.
Bold statement, Brian. Surely you've tried at least 60% of the libraries out there to make your judgement more scientific than a survey with thousands of participants ;) Please try finding a sane concurrency library in Ruby, or use the standard library primitives. Try working with binary protocols or even basic statistical problems in JavaScript. And ask yourself what % of Python libraries is of the same quality as Requests. Or go work with crypto libraries in any of the above. Clojure's standard library is small but at least if you ask me, overall it is higher quality than most languages out there. Certainly leaps and bounds better engineering-wise than Ruby. -- MK http://github.com/michaelklishin http://twitter.com/michaelklishin -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
