On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Lee Spector <lspec...@hampshire.edu> wrote:
> > > 7. This is one downside to having an IDE that's written in Clojure. > > Maybe it's unavoidable, but I would have thought that one JVM instance > could be running the IDE and another the user's code, with different > versions of Clojure if necessary. But maybe that's more complicated than I > would have thought. > It can't be *too* complicated, because recent versions of clooj do it. Indeed you can even kill -9 a hung REPL process and start a fresh one from your open clooj window, without clooj bombing out (the REPL pane will note that the REPL got disconnected, and almost anything you do will restart it in the namespace you're working in. You'll keep history memory (ctrl-uparrow stuff) but need to reload any code and reenter any stuff you did at the REPL to define vars. And avoid whatever hung your REPL before, such as triggering an infinite loop.) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
