Steven: ST2 has the following features that you wanted:
* paredit or better
- https://github.com/odyssomay/paredit
* keyboard shortcuts that dont kill my wrists/pinkies/fingers
- you can make whatever shortcuts you want
* jump-to-symbol-definition
- see my post on ST2 in the "is intellij idea a good idea" thread dated
July 25th.
* jump-to-file
- the built-in "goto anything" works for that, and there are
file-specific plugins too
* tabs (a la macvim)
- not sure what you mean, but there a plugin called "Lispindent" that
works great
* splits (a la emacs)
- not sure what you mean, but there's a "Split Into Lines" command
* magit or better (might be willing to ignore this omission though)
- Use these 3 plugins together: GitGutter, Side Bar Git, and SublimeGit
* not-super-bloated UI
- ST fits this definition perfectly
* themeable (dont care if it has a good theme, i can make one if need be, i
just need it to be themeable)
- ST is themeable (see my post in the other thread on July 25th)
* something like nrepl.el
- ST has SublimeREPL, which has a fork that works with nREPL. Link in
the other thread.
So.... looks like you're pretty much covered by ST already. :-)
Cheers,
Greg
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with
the NSA.
On Jul 27, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Steven Degutis <sbdegu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would be willing to pay /really/ good money for an editor that has a few
> features:
>
> * paredit or better
> * proper syntax highlighting of clojure (emacs rocks at this, ST2 sucks at it)
> * ST2-quality fuzzy matching at every completionable prompt (emacs's ido-mode
> is alright but ST2's is way better)
> * keyboard shortcuts that dont kill my wrists/pinkies/fingers
> * jump-to-symbol-definition
> * jump-to-file
> * tabs (a la macvim)
> * splits (a la emacs)
> * magit or better (might be willing to ignore this omission though)
> * not-super-bloated UI
> * themeable (dont care if it has a good theme, i can make one if need be, i
> just need it to be themeable)
> * something like nrepl.el
>
> (where ST2 means Sublime Text 2)
>
> That's *all* I care about, nothing else matters to me. But no editor can get
> *all* these things right.
>
> -Steven
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Colin Fleming <colin.mailingl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was planning to wait a little longer before going public, but since it's
> pretty relevant to the other IntelliJ thread going on at the moment I thought
> I'd jump in. For the last couple of months of happy unemployment I've been
> working on a fork of La Clojure which is now about 70% migrated to Clojure
> and significantly improved. It's a lot of work to develop a tool like this,
> and one of the options I'm considering is starting a company to develop it as
> a commercial product - JetBrains have never maintained development of La
> Clojure very actively. I've been doing a little market research but there's
> really not much data around about whether there are enough people working
> with Clojure to sustain a product like that, and also the community is
> currently very focused on open source.
>
> One problem is that the IDE space is already fairly fractured - there's Emacs
> and CCW, Clooj, Sublime Text and the promise of Light Table at some point,
> and of course the current public version of La Clojure. But there's still not
> a great option for something that's powerful but easy to use - CCW is
> probably the closest thing to this right now. However I think it's telling
> that a large fraction of people in the State of Clojure 2012 survey still
> identified development tools as a major pain point.
>
> I think that the IntelliJ platform is a fantastic base to build something
> like this on. Clojure as a language makes it pretty challenging to develop a
> lot of the great functionality that JetBrains are famous for, but I think
> there's scope to do a lot of great things. Certainly for mixed Clojure/Java
> projects it would be difficult to beat, but even for Clojure only projects I
> can imagine a lot of fantastic functionality built on their infrastructure.
> My plan would be to release a standalone IDE and a plugin for people using
> IntelliJ Ultimate for web dev, Ruby/Python or whatever. Since it's mostly
> Clojure now (and I'm migrating what's left as I get to it) there's a real
> possibility of a Clojure plugin/extension API. I envision charging
> PyCharm/RubyMine type prices, say $200 for company licenses or $100 for
> individual developers.
>
> So, I'd love to hear what people think. I'd appreciate it if we could stay
> away from the politics of open source vs proprietary - several people have
> told me privately that they'd rather use OSS and that's fine, proprietary
> isn't for everyone. What I'd like to know is if the idea is appealing to many
> people here?
>
> In case it's a concern for anyone, I've discussed this with JetBrains.
>
> Thanks for any feedback,
>
> Cheers,
> Colin
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
